دور دول الطوق العربي في أزمة دارفور 2003 – 2013

Abstract

This study examines the role of neighboring Arab states in the Darfur crisis during the period 2003–2013. Its aim is to analyze the nature of the roles these states played, uncover the motives behind their intervention, and assess the extent to which they contributed to containing or exacerbating the crisis. The study employs a historical approach to trace the development of relations between Sudan and its Arab neighbors, and a descriptive-analytical approach to analyze the roles, motives, and impact of these states on the course of the crisis.

The study concluded that the Arab states bordering Sudan did not adopt unified positions on the Darfur crisis. Rather, their policies were influenced by considerations of national security, national interests, and political and regional balances. The findings also showed that geographical factors and social and tribal ties contributed to the increased interest of neighboring countries in the crisis. The study indicated that Libya played a mediating role and hosted rounds of negotiations, while Egypt focused on supporting Sudanese unity, rejecting the internationalization of the crisis, and providing political and humanitarian assistance. The results also revealed that some regional initiatives contributed to easing tensions and opening channels for dialogue, but they failed to address the root causes of the conflict due to divergent interests and the absence of a unified Arab vision for managing the crisis.

Keywords for the study:

 Crisis, Arab frontline states.