Peer Review Policy
Double-Blind Peer Review System
The Journal operates a Double-Blind Peer Review process, ensuring that the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation. This system is designed to eliminate bias and ensure that manuscripts are assessed solely on their scientific merit, originality, and significance.
-
1. Preliminary Editorial Screening
Every submission undergoes an initial check for scope, formatting, and originality (iThenticate). Manuscripts that do not meet these core standards are desk-rejected.
-
2. Assignment of Expert Referees
The manuscript is sent to at least two independent experts. Reviewers are selected based on their proven expertise and research record in the specific field.
-
3. In-depth Scholarly Evaluation
Reviewers assess the methodology, results, and conclusions, providing constructive feedback to improve the manuscript's overall quality.
-
4. Final Editorial Decision
Based on the reports, editors decide to: Accept, Request revisions (Minor/Major), or Reject. In cases of conflicting reports, a third arbitrator may be appointed.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are prohibited from sharing or using the research for personal gain before publication.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, or personal) and decline the invitation if such conflicts exist.
Scientific Integrity
Reviewers are expected to report any ethical concerns, such as plagiarism or data fabrication, to the editorial board immediately.
Objectivity & Timeliness
Reviews should be objective and free from personal criticism. Reviewers must adhere to the 15-day evaluation timeframe.
Publisher: The Libyan Academy for Postgraduate Studies, Misrata Branch
Publisher Website: https://lam.edu.ly
Email: editorinchief@lam-journal.ly
