Correlation of C‑Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count with Histopathologically Proven Acute Appendicitis Faculty of Medicine, University of Misurata at period between January 2025 to June 2025

Esam Alsaghair; Omar alatrash; Taher Alkesa; Malek swesi

المؤلفون

Esam Alsaghair Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Misurata Misurata Libya
Omar alatrash Department of medical skills Faculty of Medicine University of Misurata Misurata Libya
Taher Alkesa Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Misurata Misurata Libya
Malek swesi Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Misurata Misurata Libya

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Acute appedicities، perforated appedicities، diagnostic accuracy، WBC count، CRP

الملخص

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. Laboratory markers like white blood cell (WBC) count and C‑reactive protein (CRP) are widely used for diagnosis. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and correlation of WBC and CRP with histopathology.

Methods: A Retrospective study was conducted at Misrata medical Centre (mmc) from January 2025 to June 2025 for 72 patients who underwent appendectomy. Histopathology served as the gold standard and cases were grouped as: normal appendix (n = 17), suppurative (n = 48), and perforated (n = 7). Preoperative WBC and CRP were recorded as “raised” or “not raised” using the local laboratory cutoffs used in the treating institution. Diagnostic performance measures (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated for WBC and CRP against histopathology.

Results: Of 72 patients, 17 (23.6%) had normal appendix, 48 (66.6%) suppurative appendicitis, and 7 (9.7%) perforated appendicitis. WBC sensitivity was 78.18% and specificity 82.35%; CRP sensitivity was 74.54% and specificity 70.58%.

Conclusion: Both CRP and WBC show significant correlation with histopathology, with WBC showing slightly superior diagnostic performance. Combined marker use increases diagnostic accuracy

المراجع

(1) Hansson, J., et al. (2022). Diagnostic strategies in acute appendicitis. Journal of Surgical Research, 274, 33‑40.

(2) Kumar, R., et al. (2023). Role of inflammatory markers in appendicitis diagnosis. International Journal of Surgery, 109, 45‑51.

(3) Singh, A., & Patel, S. (2022). Accuracy of CRP and WBC in appendicitis. Clinical Surgery Review, 18(2), 112‑118.

(4) Lee, Y., et al. (2023). CRP as a marker for complicated appendicitis. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 18(11), 89‑95.

(5) Mohamed, F., et al. (2024). Predictive value of inflammatory markers in appendicitis. Annals of General Surgery, 12(4), 201‑207.

(6) Fawkner-Corbett D, Hayward G, Alkhmees M, et al Diagnostic accuracy of blood tests of inflammation in paediatric appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Open 2022;12: e056854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056854

(7) The accuracy of white cell counts and C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis at a tertiary hospital October 2024South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie 62(3):45-49 DOI:10.36303/SAJS.00163

(8) Kong VY, van der Linde S, Aldous C, Handley JJ, Clarke DL. Quantifying the disparity in outcome between urban and rural patients with acute appendicitis in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(10):742-5. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.7109

(9) Withers AS, Grieve A, Loeland JA. Correlation of white cell count and CRP in acute appendicitis in paediatric patients. S Afr J Surg. 2019;57(4):40. https://doi.org/10.17159/2078- 5151/2019/v57n4a2953.