Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial species obtained from diabetic foot lesion
الملخص
Diabetic foot is a major problem lead to a serious complications. Immune impairment in this group of patients predispose to bacterial infections. Different bacterial species were identified from samples taken from diabetic foot including gram positive and gram negative species. Antimicrobial considered important part of treatment regime and selection of effective antimicrobial will lead to better recovery results. This study was aimed to identify bacterial species infected diabetic foot and their antimicrobial patterns.
Sterile cotton swab applied on the lesions and transferred to the laboratory immediately. Standard microbiology techniques were used to identify bacterial species whereas different media were used; MacConkey agar, Chocolate agar and blood agar. Multiple biochemical API 20 E test was used to identify gram negative bacteria. Catalase and coagulase test also used for gram positive collection identification. Disc diffusion method used to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of collected identified isolates.
Polymicrobial infections were 47.5% (19/40). Dominant combination of identified bacterial species was gram positive and gram negative group 15 (78.9). The highest prevalent bacterial species among gram positive isolates was S. aureus 31.7% (20/63) followed by coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS)15.9% (10/63) while Pseudomonas aeruginosa 17.5% (11/63) was the most prevalent among gram negative bacterial species. Methicillin resistant isolates was detected in 55% (n=11/20) of identified S. aureus collection. Antimicrobial resistance, Amikacin showed the highest effect against gram negative bacteria and ciprofloxacin against gram positive bacteria.
High prevalence of polymicrobial infection in diabetic foot increase the concern of serious complications. S. aureus and CNS infection occurrence was high and their resistance to methicillin was a major concern. Most combination of polymicrobial infection consisted from gram positive and negative bacterial species which require antimicrobials effective against both groups.
المراجع
ABDUL KADIR, K. A., Satyavani, M., & Pande, K. (2012). Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections. Brunei International Medical Journal, 8(1), 19-26.
Abdulrazak, A., Bitar, Z. I., Al-Shamali, A. A., & Mobasher, L. A. (2005). Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 19(3), 138-141.
Bader, M. S. (2008). Diabetic foot infection. Am Fam Physician, 78(1), 71-79.
Boulton, A. J., Vileikyte, L., Ragnarson-Tennvall, G., & Apelqvist, J. (2005). The global burden of diabetic foot disease. The Lancet, 366(9498), 1719-1724.
CLSI. (2006). 16th edn, M100-S16. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Dang, C., Prasad, Y., Boulton, A., & Jude, E. (2003). Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the diabetic foot clinic: a worsening problem. Diabetic Medicine, 20(2), 159-161.
Delamaire, M., Maugendre, D., Moreno, M., Le Goff, M. C., Allannic, H., & Genetet, B. (1997). Impaired leucocyte functions in diabetic patients. Diabetic Medicine, 14(1), 29-34.
Gadepalli, R., Dhawan, B., Sreenivas, V., Kapil, A., Ammini, A. C., & Chaudhry, R. (2006). A clinico-microbiological study of diabetic foot ulcers in an Indian tertiary care hospital. Diabetes Care, 29(8), 1727-1732. doi:10.2337/dc06-0116
Hanssen, A.-M., Kjeldsen, G., & Sollid, J. U. E. (2004). Local variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 48(1), 285-296.
http://www.idf.org/position-statement-diabetic-foot.
Kathirvel, M., Jayarajan, J., Sivakumar, A., & Govindan, V. (2018). Risk factors for the diabetic foot infection with multidrug-resistant microorganisms in South India. International Surgery Journal, 5(2), 675-682.
King, M. D., Humphrey, B. J., Wang, Y. F., Kourbatova, E. V., Ray, S. M., & Blumberg, H. M. (2006). Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Annals of internal medicine, 144(5), 309-317.
Lipsky, B. A. (2004). Medical treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis, 39 Suppl 2, S104-114. doi:10.1086/383271
Lipsky, B. A. (2004). Medical treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 39(Supplement_2), S104-S114.
Ramakant, P., Verma, A., Misra, R., Prasad, K., Chand, G., Mishra, A., . . . Mishra, S. (2011). Changing microbiological profile of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infections: time for a rethink on which empirical therapy to choose? Diabetologia, 54(1), 58-64.
Slater, R., Lazarovitch, T., Boldur, I., Ramot, Y., Buchs, A., Weiss, M., . . . Rapoport, M. (2004). Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone. Diabetic Medicine, 21(7), 705-709.
Son, S. T., Han, S.-K., Lee, T. Y., Namgoong, S., & Dhong, E.-S. (2017). The Microbiology of Diabetic Foot Infections in Korea. Journal of Wound Management and Research, 13(1), 8-12.
Tentolouris, N., Petrikkos, G., Vallianou, N., Zachos, C., Daikos, G. L., Tsapogas, P., . . . Katsilambros, N. (2006). Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in infected and uninfected diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Microbiol Infect, 12(2), 186-189. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01279.x
Xie, X., Bao, Y., Ni, L., Liu, D., Niu, S., Lin, H., . . . Huang, S. (2017). Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Guangzhou, Southern China: Focus on the Differences among Different Wagner’s Grades, IDSA/IWGDF Grades, and Ulcer Types. International journal of endocrinology, 2017.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2018 Karayem Jebril Karayem، Yasmeen Faraj Aboshala، Eltaweel Mohamed Abdallah
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
