Generative AI Tools in Libyan Higher Education
A Comparative Analysis of Student Perceptions and Usage Patterns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65540/1daxv686Keywords:
Generative AI, Ethical Challenges and Concerns, , Academic Integrity, Libyan Higher EducationAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools are becoming increasingly common in students’ academic practices in higher education. However, evidence regarding students’ use, perceptions, and concerns about Gen AI tools remains limited. This study investigated the academic usage patterns, perceptions, and reported challenges associated with ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Claude among undergraduate students at the Faculty of Information Technology, Alasmarya Islamic University (AIU), Zliten, Libya. This study employed a comparative cross-sectional quantitative analysis. Data were collected via an online questionnaire during the spring semester of 2025/2026 from 80 final-year female students enrolled in Computer Science and Internet Technology. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, and chi-square goodness-of-fit tests. The results showed that all participants used ChatGPT (100%), followed by Google Gemini (82.5%) and Claude (25.0%). Students reported using Gen AI tools for academic purposes, and the results also indicate challenges related to writing prompts, concerns about academic integrity and plagiarism, language and financial barriers, over-reliance on AI, and a lack of institutional guidance. The comparison results showed that ChatGPT was chosen most frequently for its accessibility and availability, ease of use, and usefulness for specific tasks. Google Gemini and Claude were chosen more frequently for output quality and reliability. Chi-square tests indicated that preferences differed significantly across the three tools on all four evaluation dimensions (p ≤ 0.001). The results suggest that Gen AI tools are already integrated into students' academic practices and locally provide evidence to support the development of institutional guidelines and the responsible use of Gen AI tools in Libyan higher education.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Foroughi, B., Al-Qaysi, N., Leung, N., Yaseen, Z., & Ali, N. (2026). Role of Ethical Principles and AI Characteristics in Shaping Generative AI Use in Higher Education and Its Impact on Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331261463140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331261463140
Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H. A., & Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. Syst., 12, 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385
Bittle, K. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic literature review. Information, 16(4), 296. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/4/296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296
Chatzopoulos, A., Zacharia, P., & Kantaros, A. (2026). Generative AI in higher education: A large-scale study of student usage patterns, applications and motivations. Applied Sciences, 16(12), 5972. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/16/12/5972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125972
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q., 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
élez, J. P. (2026). Generative AI and the assurance of academic integrity in higher education. Frontiers in Education. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1796556/full.
Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Support, Replacement, and Digital Literacy. Education Sciences, 15(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/5er8f
Liang, E. S., & Bai, S. (2024). Generative AI and the future of connectivist learning in higher education. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 18, 329 - 351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2386085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2386085
Liu, X. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence into student learning: Opportunities and challenges in emerging economies. ScienceDirect, 17(2), 78–94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000788
Mavrych, V., Yaqinuddin, A., & Bolgova, O. (2025). Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini Performance versus Students in Different Topics of Neuroscience.. Advances in physiology education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00093.2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00093.2024
Mazaherian, A., & Nourbakhsh, E. (2025). Beyond the Hype: Critical Analysis of Student Motivations and Ethical Boundaries in Educational AI Use in Higher Education. ArXiv, abs/2511.11369. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.11369
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Digital Transformation Education, Opportunities, and Challenges of the Application of ChatGPT to Emerging Economies. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7605075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7605075
Nelson, A., Santamaría, P., Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050611
Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643
Omar, S. M. A. (2026). Exploring the Use of AI Tools for Academic Purposes among Libyan EFL Undergraduate Students at the Department of English, Sabratha University. International Science and Technology Journal. https://doi.org/10.62341/istj-vol38-2-sr43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62341/istj-vol38-2-sr43
Omeh, C. B., Olelewe, C. J., & Ohanu, I. (2025). Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technology on Students' Computational and Reflective Thinking in a Computer Programming Course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70052
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6, 342-363.
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Sergeeva, O. V., Zheltukhina, M. R., Shoustikova, T., Tukhvatullina, L. R., Dobrokhotov, D., & Kondrashev, S. V. (2025). Understanding higher education students’ adoption of generative AI technologies: An empirical investigation using UTAUT2. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16039
Sobaih, A. E. E., & Elnasr, A. E. A. (2025). Battle of AI chatbots: Graduate students’ perceptions of ChatGPT versus Gemini for learning purposes in Egyptian higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2025.8.1.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2025.8.1.7
Stone, B. W. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: Uncertain Students, Ambiguous Use Cases, and Mercenary Perspectives. Teaching of Psychology, 52, 347 - 356. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241305398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241305398
Swidan, A., Lee, S., & Romdhane, S. B. (2025). College Students’ Use and Perceptions of AI Tools in the UAE: Motivations, Ethical Concerns and Institutional Guidelines. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040461
Tbaishat, D., & Elfadel, M. (2025). Exploring students’ perceptions of GenAI tools in higher education: a case study. Cogent Education, 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2560613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2560613
Tran, M., Balasooriya, C., Semmler, C., & Rhee, J. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence: the more knowledgeable other in a social constructivist framework of medical education. NPJ Digital Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01823-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01823-8
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q., 27, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
Yeung, R. S. K., Tian, R., Chiu, D. K. W., & Choi, S. (2025). University students' perceptions on how generative artificial intelligence shape learning and research practices: A case study in Hong Kong. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(1), 102783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103082
Zerouali, A., Benali, M., Kaddouri, E., Begdouri, A., Bakhtaoui, I., Atmani, K., & Kacimi, D. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LEARNING THEORIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. INTED Proceedings,1079-2340. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2026.2447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2026.2447
Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Liu, M. (2026). Generative AI use profiles and academic outcomes in higher education: the role of institutional support. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2026.2668610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2026.2668610
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Entisar Alhadi Al Ghawail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
