Different Pontic design with fixed dental prosthesis in Misrata - Libya

المؤلفون

  • Ahmed Algellai Department of Dental Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Misrata – Libya
  • Adnan Hmeida Department of Dental Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Misrata – Libya
  • Abdul hakim Elraaid Department of Dental Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Misrata – Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65540/jar.v26i.534

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Pontics، Fixed prosthesis

الملخص

The endpoint of fixed prosthesis design is an esthetic and functional pontic that is compatible with soft-tissue health. The current study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of Pontic design selection by the general dental practitioners (GDPs). This cross-sectional study was conduct among the GDPs of Misrata. A questionnaire was design to collect data from 110 GDPs. The questionnaire included general/demographic information and an average number of fixed prosthesis constructed by the GDPs. The questionnaire was further categorize to evaluate the knowledge/practice of Pontic design selection and latest recommendations. For the maxillary anterior segment, the ridge lap Pontic was the most common (43%) followed by the conical (28%). In the maxillary posterior segment, the ridge lap Pontic was the most common (56%) followed by ovate design (23%). For the mandibular anterior segment, the ridge lap (44%) was the most common followed by modified ridge lap Pontic (27%). In case of the mandibular posterior segment, the ridge lap design (64%) was the most common followed by conical Pontic (18%). In the posterior segment, where esthetics is not as critical, a sanitary pontic form is most compatible with function and hygiene. In anterior region, esthetics is an important concern along with function and space management. ​In the maxillary anterior region, a properly contoured modified ridge-lap pontic design constructed of glazed porcelain most readily fulfills both the esthetic and physiologic requirements. The Pontic design selection for the fixed prosthesis is a neglected domain.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Shilling burg HT, Sather DA, Wilson EL, Cain J, Mitchell D, Blanco L, et al. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Surrey, United Kingdom: Quintessence Publishing Company; 2012.

Parkinson CF, Schaberg TV. Pontic design of posterior fixed partial prostheses: Is it a microbial misadventure? J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51:51-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80105-5

Johnston JF, Phillips RW, Dykema RW. Modern Practice in Crown and Bridge Prosthodontics. Philadelphia, USA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1971.

Hirshberg SM. The relationship of oral hygiene to embrasure and pontic design – A preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27:26-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90170-9

Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics-E-Book. Sr. Louis, Missouri, USA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

Tripodakis A, Konstantinidis A. Tissue response under hyperpressure from convex pontics. Hell Stomatol Chron 1989; 33:159-64.

Nagarsekar A, Gaunkar R, Aras M. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of dental professionals regarding the effect and management of food impaction associated with fixed partial denture prostheses: A survey. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016; 16:372-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.191286

التنزيلات

منشور

2023-06-15

إصدار

القسم

العلوم الهندسية والتطبيقية

كيفية الاقتباس

Different Pontic design with fixed dental prosthesis in Misrata - Libya. (2023). مجلة البحوث الأكاديمية, 26, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.65540/jar.v26i.534